20 Dating Apps Compared
A practical comparison of 20 dating App options, with a short breakdown of each provider's focus, pricing, free plan, and possible drawbacks.
Match
For Match, the collected research highlights "detailed profiles with powerful filters" as the main feature. It is mainly suited to singles seeking serious relationships.
Public pricing was not available in the collected data. No free plan was listed when the research was collected.
The main points to check are fake profiles and scammers, difficult cancellation process, poor customer service. These notes come from the collected research and may not describe every customer's experience.
Okcupid
For Okcupid, the collected research highlights "match based on who you are" as the main feature. It is mainly suited to singles seeking romantic relationships.
Public pricing was not available in the collected data. No free plan was listed when the research was collected.
The main points to check are app frequently crashes, many fake/scam profiles, arbitrary bans with no explanation. These notes come from the collected research and may not describe every customer's experience.
Bumble
For Bumble, the collected research highlights "women make the first move" as the main feature. It is mainly suited to singles seeking relationships friends seekers.
Public pricing was not available in the collected data. No free plan was listed when the research was collected.
The main points to check are fake profiles, disappearing likes, poor customer support. These notes come from the collected research and may not describe every customer's experience.
Tinder
For Tinder, the collected research highlights "swipe Right matching technology" as the main feature. It is mainly suited to young adults looking for dating.
Public pricing was not available in the collected data. No free plan was listed when the research was collected.
The main points to check are frequent app bugs, subscription nags, fake profiles. These notes come from the collected research and may not describe every customer's experience.
Eharmony
For Eharmony, the collected research highlights "unique Compatibility Matching System" as the main feature. It is mainly suited to serious singles seeking love.
Public pricing was not available in the collected data. No free plan was listed when the research was collected.
The main points to check are limited profile visibility, misleading subscription terms, high pricing. These notes come from the collected research and may not describe every customer's experience.
Hinge
For Hinge, the collected research highlights "nobel Prize winning compatibility algorithm" as the main feature. It is mainly suited to singles seeking serious relationships.
Public pricing was not available in the collected data. No free plan was listed when the research was collected.
The main points to check are unexplained bans, poor subscription value, many fake profiles. These notes come from the collected research and may not describe every customer's experience.
Pof
For Pof, the collected research highlights "most welcoming friendly dating community" as the main feature. It is mainly suited to singles looking for dating.
Public pricing was not available in the collected data. No free plan was listed when the research was collected.
The main points to check are buggy website, many fake profiles, difficult subscription cancellation. These notes come from the collected research and may not describe every customer's experience.
Theleague
For Theleague, the collected research highlights "selective curated community" as the main feature. It is mainly suited to busy professionals seeking relationships.
Public pricing was not available in the collected data. No free plan was listed when the research was collected.
The main points to check are matches often far outside chosen area, app glitches and issues, repetitive fake or inactive profiles. These notes come from the collected research and may not describe every customer's experience.
Searchforancestors
Searchforancestors appears in the dating app market, but its website could not be checked during the original research. Its main feature and intended users should therefore be confirmed directly with the provider.
Public pricing was not available in the collected data. No free plan was listed when the research was collected.
The main points to check are many sites not truly free, data inaccuracies on FamilySearch, free trials can be misleading. These notes come from the collected research and may not describe every customer's experience.
Dna Explained
Dna Explained appears in the dating app market, but its website could not be checked during the original research. Its main feature and intended users should therefore be confirmed directly with the provider.
Public pricing was not available in the collected data. No free plan was listed when the research was collected.
The main points to check are slow setup process, lack of continual support, errors with DNA sample handling. These notes come from the collected research and may not describe every customer's experience.
Family Tree
Family Tree appears in the dating app market, but its website could not be checked during the original research. Its main feature and intended users should therefore be confirmed directly with the provider.
Public pricing was not available in the collected data. No free plan was listed when the research was collected.
The main points to check are unreliable without original documents, linking to famous figures often false, errors in family connections. These notes come from the collected research and may not describe every customer's experience.
Tawkify
For Tawkify, the collected research highlights "personal matchmaker with custom date planning" as the main feature. It is mainly suited to relationship ready singles.
Public pricing was not available in the collected data. No free plan was listed when the research was collected.
The main points to check are lack of transparency on active members, no matches for some users, high cost per date. These notes come from the collected research and may not describe every customer's experience.
Download
For Download, the collected research highlights "personalized AI matchmaker service" as the main feature. It is mainly suited to young urban professionals.
Public pricing was not available in the collected data. No free plan was listed when the research was collected.
The main points to check are long onboarding process, poor AI matching, unresponsive support. These notes come from the collected research and may not describe every customer's experience.
Doubble
For Doubble, the collected research highlights "dating app for doubble dates" as the main feature. It is mainly suited to friends looking for doubble dates.
Public pricing was not available in the collected data. No free plan was listed when the research was collected.
The main points to check are gallery access bug, requires 4 friends to join, matches too far away. These notes come from the collected research and may not describe every customer's experience.
Keeper
For Keeper, the collected research highlights "AI-powered soulmate matchmaking" as the main feature. It is mainly suited to serious singles seeking marriage.
Public pricing was not available in the collected data. No free plan was listed when the research was collected.
The collected review notes may refer to a different product or company, so they are not used in this comparison. Check recent product reviews before making a decision.
Famlii
For Famlii, the collected research highlights "AI-powered soulmate matching" as the main feature. It is mainly suited to serious men and women.
Public pricing was not available in the collected data. No free plan was listed when the research was collected.
The main points to check are followers delete quickly, poor customer support, service not delivered. These notes come from the collected research and may not describe every customer's experience.
Loxclubapp
For Loxclubapp, the collected research highlights "exclusive dating app for Jewish singles" as the main feature. It is mainly suited to jewish singles with high standards.
Public pricing was not available in the collected data. No free plan was listed when the research was collected.
The main points to check are small membership pool, no distance filter, subscription required. These notes come from the collected research and may not describe every customer's experience.
Getchorus
For Getchorus, the collected research highlights "friends swipe for friends matchmaking" as the main feature. It is mainly suited to young adults seeking dating.
Public pricing was not available in the collected data. No free plan was listed when the research was collected.
The source data did not include a clear drawback. That does not mean the product has no limits, so test the parts that matter to your workflow.
Loopmein
For Loopmein, the collected research highlights "matchmaking by friends not algorithms" as the main feature. It is mainly suited to singles and matchmakers.
Public pricing was not available in the collected data. No free plan was listed when the research was collected.
The main points to check are no user reviews available, no pricing info provided, unproven value for money. These notes come from the collected research and may not describe every customer's experience.
Cousincountry
Cousincountry appears in the dating app market, but its website could not be checked during the original research. Its main feature and intended users should therefore be confirmed directly with the provider.
Public pricing was not available in the collected data. No free plan was listed when the research was collected.
The source data did not include a clear drawback. That does not mean the product has no limits, so test the parts that matter to your workflow.
Prices, plans, and product details can change. Check each provider's website before making a final decision.